网站标志
加盟留言
版主管理 | 推荐 | 删除 | 删除并扣分
Why Almost Everything You`ve Learned About Safe Deposit Lock Is Wrong And What It Is Best To Know
No, most burglaries don`t contain selecting locks or different types of bypass, but that may change if legislation does not cease the trafficking in bump keys. In my opinion, Primus provides the next degree of safety in opposition to bumping, however Medeco is extra safe against selecting. Most excessive security locks make use of secondary locking programs so as to add one other layer of safety. Thus, warded, lever, wafer, magnetic, and disk locks cannot be bumped open. When the article is experienced as nonidentical, the subject takes a stance in opposition to the limits of conceptualization and is open to the other as different (Cornell 1992, 24). Negative dialectics doesn`t arrange new ideas, however fairly relates the previous ideas to each other in order to indicate what has been omitted-that is, what conflicts. Negative dialectics reveals that a given object stays nonidentical, even as it`s represented and made familiar. Negative dialectics, Adorno argues, is a type of thought needed in a improper world, a wrong world full of suffering and oppression (Holloway 2009, 8). Negative dialectics is the mode of thinking that fits the antagonistic character of capitalist society and goals at overcoming it.
Modern thought, in its pursuit of identitarian considering, has ignored difference partly as a result of thought is driven by a capitalist social formation whose exchange principle demands equivalence of exchange worth and use value. That`s, by way of capacitating processes like genetic therapies, surgeries, supplements, prosthetic enhancements, and healthism, there`s a shift from regulative normality that cures or rehabilitates to biological management, https://safedepositlocks3.wordpress.com/2021/09/17/how-to-show-bank-safe-deposit-box/ where our bodies are to be capacitated beyond what`s considered because the ready-body. Based on Puar, neoliberalism mobilizes the tension between capacity and debility to interrupt down the binaries between normative/non-normative, disabled/abled as a result of \"debility is worthwhile to capitalism, however so is the demand to `recover` from or overcome it\" (154) by processes of capacitation. A biopolitical shift has occurred whose focus is the differential capacitation of all our bodies, she claims, not the achievement of a normative ready-bodiness. Puar contends that given biopolitical developments in neoliberal capitalism, normalizing the disabled physique is now not the most important focus of medical intervention. In one exploration of the ways during which a selected difference-particularly, incapacity-is important, Garland-Thomson (2011, 604) theorizes disabled people as \"misfits\" inside a society of equivalence, noting that \"misfitting can yield progressive perspectives.\" She argues: \"Once we fit harmoniously and properly into the world, we forget the reality of contingency because the world sustains us. After we experience misfitting and recognize that disjuncture for its political potential, we expose the relational element and the fragility of fitting\" (597). The difference of incapacity as misfit opens up political possibilities by means of confronting what suits with that which does not.
Intervening within the ways in which the binary of disabled and abled is produced by means of the lens of capacity and debility makes it potential to query the methods through which the distinction of incapacity reifies an exceptionalism and simplified conceptualization of disability that solely sure privileged disabled bodies can occupy (ibid.). An economics of both debility and capacity serves the pursuits of neoliberal capital and reshapes formations of disability. Although Puar recognizes the methods in which equivalence and identity are at work within neoliberal capitalist economies, she challenges this pairing via an examination of the processes of capability and debility that exceed the class of incapacity. Jasbir Puar (2012) challenges disability activists and students to rethink the importance that they offer to incapacity as a distinction that matters and to, as an alternative, consider all our bodies in terms of affective neoliberal control. Constellations give type to an object with out the elimination of distinction that will reduce the factor to an idea that`s itself subsumed throughout the terms of a universalizing and totalizing principle (Adorno 1973, 162). A factor can by no means be known in its immediacy or in unity with an idea and thus we can only method the factor by way of a constellation of concepts that sheds mild on the specific elements of it which might be disregarded of the figuring out process (Cornell 1992, 23). In this way, the particularity of an object may be seen to function in a negative dialectical vogue towards totality as the excess of any system`s thought.
Therefore, Puar`s intervention into incapacity studies examines the ways during which the distinction of incapacity is produced and how particular forms of incapacity develop into valorized. There are some ways by which feminist philosophy of disability and incapacity studies can profit from pondering negatively. For instance, the emphasis on particular person autonomy that permeates trendy Western society is negated once we consider the idea of particular person autonomy by way of the lens of essential disability studies (Shildrick 2009; Fritsch 2010). The vital disability studies literature that emphasizes relations of interdependence factors to what is excluded from the idea of the subject when that subject is assumed to own particular person autonomy and, by means of the conflict of the nonidentical, exposes the complexity of the concept of particular person autonomy and the potential for other forms of being. For example, with the development of bioinformatics, where bodies should not identities, but somewhat knowledge or pieces of emergent data, it`s relevant to ask: \"which debilitated our bodies can be reinvigorated for neoliberalism, and which can not?\" (153). Such a shift changes how incapacity may be conceived and materialized across levels of social and material relations, along with questioning the presumed capacitated status of abled-our bodies.
2021-9-18 17:41:13 BY 游客   查看:233 次   以下共有回复:0 篇  
共0篇回复 每页10篇 页次:1/1
我要回复
回复内容
验 证 码
看不清?更换一张
匿名发表 
脚注信息
广东叶其芳健康咨询有限公司网站 Copyright(C)2009-2021